Safety Speed Cut Thermwood Corporation ECabinet Systems

Cabinetmaking

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

Post a Response
The staff at WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at any WOODWEB Forum. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.
Your Name:
Your Website:
Email Address:
Subject: Re: Insert tooling fitment problem

Message:

(read message guidelines).
Note: Do not use the below fields to advertise your business - only for links related to the discussion.
Thread Related Link URL:
Thread Related Link Title:
  To "point" to an image (picture) from another website, provide the URL (Web Address) of the file ( include ONE reference to http:// )
Thread Related Image URL:

Date of your Birth:

Upload a Thread Related File:
File Types: Image (gif-jpg-png-bmp), PDF, Sketchup, Video (mov avi wmv mpeg mpg mp4 ogg). (Image Upload Tips)

I have read the Site User Agreement and agree with the Terms

  <= Check to receive e-mail notification of responses

Message Thread:

Insert tooling fitment problem

12/18/20       
Thomas

We recently purchased a HD3 insert tooling body and cutters. First time using them. We were sold from all the positive comments here. We are having a problem though. Our stile and rail joints are loose. Approx. .009 difference between the tongue and the grove. We had new inserts sent out and had the same problem. Looked at the shapers. Runout is less than .002. We mounted dial indicator on the spindle and measured the table. .006 out from the highest point to the lowest. Shimmed the spindle but did not help. Any ideas as to why the sloppy fit? We are using Weaver shapers fwiw. Thanks

12/18/20       #2: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Dustin orth

Mount the inserts and digital mic the high spots, I found on some Byrd tool door bodies that I had to adjust them to get the fit better. We had 3 sets of heads and one type that I had to shift slightly to get a tight fit.

12/18/20       #3: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Thomas

Dustin, what do you mean by adjust them for a better fit? On the stile and rail cutters, if I shift the tenon it will make the tenon thinner and if I shift the mortise or slot it will make it wider. Not sure I am understanding what you are saying.

12/18/20       #4: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Dustin orth

Its tricky to get these adjusted if they don't fit right. I think I spent a few days and lots of wood to tighten this up. Little brass shims, paper and a table mounted mic to measure from the top to find the offset insert.

12/19/20       #5: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

What's the run out of the spindle?
Is it properly trammed to the table?

Cutters are usually made as perfect mirrors of a profile. If machined perfectly, they won't go together. The tool makers rely on some degree of inaccuracy on our part to get enough slop to create room for glue and assembly.

12/20/20       #6: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Thomas

Karl,
The runout on the spindles is .0012 on one and .0023 on the other. The tables are .0001 and .0003 square to the spindle. The measurement of the tongue and groove cutters are within .003 - .0049 difference between each other. After cutting the joints they are so loose that they zero resistance going together and falling out. Place one on the other and try to turn them upside down and they fall apart like a ball bearing rolling on glass. We will be sending the tables out Monday to another machine shop to get a second opinion. Don't know what to do next. Could it be vibration from Weaver shapers not being heavy enough cut clean?

12/20/20       #7: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

Weaver.

There's your answer. They were never meant to handle the big insert heads.

12/20/20       #8: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Dustin orth

.003 to .0049 gap difference on the tongue and groove is the issue. There is a cutter either offset ground or ground improperly. Mic out each tip on that area both in width, depth and offset from edge. You'll find one isn't right compared to the others. Like I mentioned above, its not easy to nail down exactly whats the cause here.
Does a shop near you have an optical comparator? Usually a high end millwork shop or machine shop. They can check the offsets and dimensions on a scope within a few minutes. Wish I had one!

12/21/20       #9: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Thomas

Karl, I respect what you say. You always have good insight. I don't understand how a stack of Freeborn stile and rail cutters works fine and is a lot heavier and larger than the HD3 head. Seems like the lighter set would run smoother.
Dustin, I took the head and cutters in to a local shop that makes cnc tooling and insert tooling. They brought me to the back and used a comparator to check the cutters. They stated that the cutters were fine and should have a tight fit. I had them make another set just to satisfy my mind. They produced the same slop that original cutters did. This is a large company and were not the manufacture of the head. They did advise that the HD3 head was a good quality set. I am not a machinist but am leaning towards the machine vibration. Maybe I can add some sandbag to the base of the machine.....
Thanks y'all

12/21/20       #10: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

If you were running bigger, heavier cutters before, then I don't know what to say.

Could be a tramming issue.

Could be some weird harmonic building up with that head. A change in rpm might be the answer, but tough if you're running at an optimal chip load, and slowing down a feeder sucks.

I have two powermatic shapers that do nothing but cope. Sloppy fit, just on the verge of being problematic. I like my R&S joints so if you put in a 6-8" rail on, you can flip it over and it'll stay. That's likely too tight, but I can't get that out of those powermatics. If I drop the head into one of my better shapers with no adjustment, I'll get that fitment and then some. I don't have awesome shapers either. Mostly SAC and SCM.

12/22/20       #11: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Jeremy

Thomas- I wood like to switch over to insert heads here shortly. The brazed Freeborns just aren’t cutting the mustard anymore, but like Karl I have SCM shapers. I was just wondering, since you already went to a custom shop nearby and had them make new inserts, rather than making exact mirror images of one another could they fudge either the tongue or groove by .005” or so? In essence taking the place of shims in a stacked set. I don’t know if this is possible but I might be in the same situation when I switch over. Shapers and tolerances are good but maybe not good enough. Just a thought

12/22/20       #12: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Tom Gardiner

Can you see resin deposit on each insert indicating where each insert is cutting? It is possible that one insert is cutting the upper portion and the other cutting the lower so the inserts are shifted vertically with respect to each other. You would see tell tale areas of the profile left clean where it is not cutting.

12/22/20       #13: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Scott

My quess is it is the cutters, if the Freeborn cutters were good, that tells me your shaper and spindle are not the problem. I would send them back, that stuff is not cheap so one would expect good quality. The readings you mentioned are to much of a variance..

12/23/20       #14: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Thomas

Jeremy, that sounds logical and will probably be my next step if I can't chase this problem down. I believe I would rather find the problem and fix it rather than "fudge" the grind on the knives. That would probably work....but then I would always wonder what the real problem was.
Tom, I had not thought about that. I will run them again and closely inspect the amount of resin build up on each knife.
Scott, that sounds logical except with the stack Freeborn cutters (or any other stack brand) I can adjust my tenon or sticking groove by adding or subtracting shims. This would account for a tight fit even with a slightly worn bed or spindle alignment.
After the 1st I will go back to Misenhimer's and have both sets of knives put on the comparator.
It might be time for a good door machine.... Thanks all for your responses.

12/23/20       #15: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Kevin

Hi Thomas: I work for H3D Tool Corp. I would be glad to discuss issues you are having and see if we can figure out what is going on. Sounds like you are in Tenn. since you mentioned Misenheimer. I manage a sales territory which covers Tenn. You can reach me on my cell @
828-302-4902

12/24/20       #16: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Bruce H

Is this a one piece carbide insert where you can't shim between the cutters? A 6 piece set from Freeborn can easily be shimmed to get the fit you want. I'd guess your Weaver shapers aren't precision or rigid enough to run that kind of tooling. Sandbags on the floor isn't going to help.

12/25/20       #17: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
keith farr

We run Byrd insert heads and have found thru the years that as precise as they fit into the head , they can be of just a bit. When I replace knives, I place them in the head then run some samples Usually the fit is loose I pull the heads off and get under good light and look at how they relate to the body Byrd inserts flush up to the top of the body so you can feel or even see if one knife is in a different position in the head Ususally loosening the gibs slightly and retightening and double checking the insert position to body helps tighten the fit Im talking very small adjustments here Also make sure you are running bodys as low on shaper shaft as possible, run out is least at the lowest point Also If you are using bushings make sure the bottom of the bushings are in good shape( perpendicular to shaft.) If bushing is not perfect, when tightened down you have run out even if shaft is perfect. Ive found this to be a big issue I have four Weaver shapers for thirty plus years two with 1 1/4" shafts two with 3/4" shafts so all knives are 1/1/4" and use bushings to run on the smaller shafts. Have never had problem with major runout but have found more problems with fitting the knives in the head and crappy bushings that arent precise

12/29/20       #18: Insert tooling fitment problem ...
Thomas

Bruce, yes these are insert tooling cutters. Each head has three cutters (all the same cut) I don't have any problem with the stack cutters as they can be shimmed.
Keith, I will order some new spacers today. We have three wavers all 1.25 inch shafts. Built in 1996. Weaver wants close to $1800 for one new spindle and about $400 to rebuild. We will order spacers before spending that much money. In the mean time we are running this job with Freeborn stack cutters. Really want to start using the insert tooling though.
Thank you all for the responses. Woodweb has been a great resource for wisdom and support for many years.

 

Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Limtech Industries, Inc. Lamello
    Today's Sponsors

    Become a Sponsor today!