Question
I just started my first project with teak, and am getting my initiation the hard way. I know teak can present challenges. It is sometimes difficult to bond and its hard/abrasive nature wears tools. However, I am getting a terrible surface finish after planing about 1/4" off of 3 or 4 boards and there is a fair amount of heat in the boards as they come out of the planer. And these are with brand new knives on a Powermatic 15S. Does it really dull knives that fast or am I missing something simple? There are deep grooves that follow the grain of the wood. And sanding it down is a fiasco, as the oil gums up my sandpaper.
Forum Responses
(Solid Wood Machining Forum)
From Dave Rankin, forum technical advisor:
Teak will dull steel knives fast. You need to use either DGK coated knives or carbide. The abrasive nature of teak will produce heat and nick knives quickly.
I took the cover off and cleaned a lot of pitch off the back of the blade and the cove in front/underneath. Pardon my understanding of the terminology, but would that be the gullet? I don't have an especially trained eye, but I did not see any real nicks and the back bevel was still present and the grind marks visible.
Can anyone tell me a more scientific way of determining what is an unacceptable amount of wear besides firing it up and trying another board? In the meanwhile I still welcome any tips on the best place to find a carbide blade.
Contributor F - I don’t know if I misled when I said I took off 1/4". I didn't mean in one pass. I had 4/4 rough stock that I milled down to 0.750", taking about 0.020-0.030" per pass.
Are you running high production? 25,000 lineal feet or more? Are you a small shop that will run teak occasionally, but oak, maple and poplar more often? Are you on a budget?
If you are running high production then carbide is the way to go without a doubt. If you are a small shop and going to run only 2 or 3 thousand lineal feet then DGK is a less expensive option.
DGK is a heat reflective coating that is harder than carbide. It is only 7 microns thick so it does not flack. With it being this thin it also allows you to grind and joint the knives with standard ceramic or vitrified abrasives. In the field, DGK has proven to work well on long runs of maple, medium to short runs of teak and even MDF. It is simply an option.
A simple cost comparison:
HSS planer blades about $2 per inch
DGK planer blades about $4.50 per inch
Carbide planer blades $8 up per inch
As the user, you are the only one that knows your production requirements.
According to Powermatic, these blades are carbide tipped. They did not believe that that amount of teak should have dulled my blade. I didn’t ask the department to qualify if that were so for steel or just the carbide tipped.
He was not sure why the advertising people don't point this out as it would be a selling point. In addition to cleaning the pitch off the blades, they recommended that I make sure the chip breaker was as close as possible to the cutterhead. In addition to allowing buildup behind the blade, they said this could allow chips to accumulate in the serrated infeed roller and embed into the surface of the wood just ahead of the cutterhead.
Finally, these blades are straight when they come out of the box. They are flexed as they are fastened to the head. Pardon me if I am restating the obvious to all who have more experience with spiral knives.
I don't know if the aftermarket knives that various people offer are solid carbide, but this mounting method would probably preclude that. Perhaps they are carbide tipped as well.
Finally, there is no recommended adjustment on the serrated infeed roller. I should plan my work so that I avoid the desire/need for making a 0.001" cleanup cut and the subsequent licorice look.
You can count on changing the knives after running, even one piece. Buying carbide is generally not practical for a small custom shop using teak on an occasional basis. You also might consider paying someone with carbide to do the milling for you. I would be skeptical of the claims being made regarding DGK. WI Knife makes what appears to be an identical product called Optisteel, I don't know if its available in thin planer blades.
Solid Carbide: Normally most expensive and last well.
Carbide Tipped or Inlay: Normally less expensive and last almost as long. They are areat choice for medium runs in teak.
DGK Coated: 7 micron thin heat reflective coating that is applied in a high technology vaporization process that takes several hours. They grind very easily.
Opti-Knife: A specially heat treated knife from WKW that works well in many applications.
HSS: There are many different HSS. Some will only run a few feet in teak while others will run a few hundred feet.
The length of the teak run should be considered and the frequency of running teak and maple should also be considered. Carbide will not produce as good of finish as the HSS, Opti or DGK.
Carbide will last longer.
There are many tool products on the market, T1 is another option. One thing that we do here at MSI is test every product that we can. As techs with over 40 years between us, we have tested or run in production most every type of cutting tool product available at this time. The reason for so many options is to provide the end user with the most cost effective product that will work.
Basically DGK is a newer coating that is harder and has a lower coefficient of friction. There is also another process which can be thought of as surface heat treatment. Plasma nitriding will penetrate M2 HSS up to .005". It brings the surface of M2 from RC62+/- to RC72+/-. Some companies’ offer a dual coating in which they will first surface harden and then surface coat.
NorthEast Coatings in Maine has coated several of my custom moulding cutters. The cutters come back sharper and harder.
One respondent suggested I refrain from planing and re-saw as close to final thickness as I can with the bandsaw, then reserve the planer for final cleanup passes. The dealer that sold me the planer further suggested that I use a drum sander for that instead of ever involving a planer. From my own experience I agree that sanding was a lot more effective than planing, and I managed to salvage the project this way. Someone else suggested wet sanding as a way to get around the oil gum up issues with sandpaper.