Q.
I am looking for information on drying northern red oak. I am finding a large variation in the moisture content, from overdry to wet. The wood is from the same set of kilns and cut at the same sawmill. A consultant came years ago and said the only thing he could think of was a fungus.
Forum Responses
These thoughts come to mind:
1. Not going to equalizing step at the correct time. In other words, if you are going to equalizing when your lowest sample is 5%, how are you turning up with overdry?
2. Not equalizing long enough. This should take care of your wet pieces.
3. Instrument calibrations off (RH/temp sensing devices not giving you correct readings).
4. Air flow problems, i.e., fan motors out, fan motors not all going in the right direction, line shaft broken, reversing timer device malfunction?
5. Exiting MC data needs to be obtained from freshly cut pieces along with conventional oven tests. The sample data used from the beginning and throughout the charge does not suffice for accurate data towards the end of the charge.
6. Large variance in MC of lumber at start-up. Could be due to improper mixing of lumber from varying sources--green and predried, predried and shed dried, etc.
Gene Wengert, forum technical advisor
Gene Wengert, forum technical advisor
Regarding bacterially infected wood, its identification is difficult. However, red oak that is over 90% MC, that smells terrible, and perhaps has some colors that are darker than normal would be highly suspect.
Also, whenever you shake (separation parallel to the rings), you can be 99% sure that it is bacterially infected. The problem is that shake is only in part of the bacterially infected wood.
There is a report out about detecting bacterial presence with acoustics, but the report has a flaw. The way they determined if there was bacteria present was visually (they divided it into none, light, medium and heavy infections) and then they confirmed that the acoustic readings were different in these pieces, meaning that the acoustics worked. The problem is that visual identification is nearly impossible--if it was easy then why use acoustics? In this research, the ID was done by a technician that has probably dried under 10,000 board feet of oak in his lifetime! The same group also "proved" that DH drying dried oak with higher quality than conventional--of course, the conventional kiln was a lab kiln which will have more severe conditions than in a commercial kiln, due to temperature drop and RH rise in a conventional kiln.
Gene Wengert, forum technical advisor
Gene Wengert, forum technical advisor