Safety Speed Cut Thermwood Corporation ECabinet Systems

Cabinetmaking

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

Post a Response
The staff at WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at any WOODWEB Forum. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.
Your Name:
Your Website:
Email Address:
Subject: Re: Pockethole cutter

Message:

(read message guidelines).
Note: Do not use the below fields to advertise your business - only for links related to the discussion.
Thread Related Link URL:
Thread Related Link Title:
  To "point" to an image (picture) from another website, provide the URL (Web Address) of the file ( include ONE reference to http:// )
Thread Related Image URL:

Date of your Birth:

Upload a Thread Related File:
File Types: Image (gif-jpg-png-bmp), PDF, Sketchup, Video (mov avi wmv mpeg mpg mp4 ogg). (Image Upload Tips)

I have read the Site User Agreement and agree with the Terms

  <= Check to receive e-mail notification of responses

Message Thread:

Pockethole cutter

9/25/24       
Robert

Hi all. I am going to have to replace our pocket hole machine. We currently have a Castle TSM21. Bought used and it has served its purpose but is on its last leg and we've rigged it up all we can. What's your suggestions for best replacement? Castle, Ritter, or something else? FWIW, we liked the Castle when it was working well, but don't really have experience with any others so don't know if we're missing out on something better lol. Thanks guys

9/26/24       #2: Pockethole cutter ...
RODNEY BLACKERBY Member

We have Unquie and Ritter witch is an older one that dug out of storage and order new parts, and put it back into production, I prefer it over the unquie.kind of the simple and will last the test of time. thats my 2cents.
9/26/24       #3: Pockethole cutter ...
Leo G Member

Been using the Kreg Foreman forever. Figured out how to reduce slippage and it's not an issue anymore. Simple machine and I have the pneumatic version so it'll likely outlast me as long as the oil is full.

Stop laughing......

LOL

9/26/24       #4: Pockethole cutter ...
duster

I also have been using a pnuematic Kreg machine for the last 10 years or so. It's reliable and low maintenence. Also, it has a small footprint. We built ours into one of our shop cabinets between some drawers.

9/28/24       #5: Pockethole cutter ...
Bill

I have own 2 castles and the Kreg. All three will drill lots of holes with little trouble if maintained. For what it’s worth I like the castle machines better. I like the lower angle pocket.

9/28/24       #6: Pockethole cutter ...
Robert

Thanks for the responses. I used the Kreg for years, but like Bill, I prefer the lower angle. Think we will just go back with a new model of the Castle we have.

9/30/24       #7: Pockethole cutter ...
Matt Member

Castle. We have several of them, the lower angle of the cut makes it a great system. One of ours is a very old benchtop model that we robbed an air piston from an old door drill that works as the hold-down mechanism. That was the weak point on our benchtop. That, and I think we had to mod it to fit in a new trim router at one point.

The other is the nice cabinet style floor model with the foot pedal, it's about 5 years old and well worth the cost. Cuts hundreds of pockets every day.

9/30/24       #8: Pockethole cutter ...
Matt Krig Member

Check out Safety Speed Manufacturing. We've run it side by side with the Castle and everyone chooses the the Safety Speed. Their mechanism makes a lot more sense, when you run one, you'll see that they've gone further with the innovation. I've run the Ritter and Kreg, and I can say once a person goes to a low angle system with a drill and a router bit to cut the pockets, you'll not want to go back.

https://safetyspeed.com/product-category/machines/screw-pocket-machines/

10/1/24       #9: Pockethole cutter ...
sam cohen Member

Matt Krig - what about the Safety Speed do people like better? Choosing between the benchtop models myself and was leaning toward the Castle, but it was a toss up.

10/2/24       #10: Pockethole cutter ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

The Safety Speed one looks interesting. I replaced both my Castle machines with new ones a few years ago and asked the salesman about the Safety Speed Cut and he didn't have much positive to say.

I dont know if that's because of salesman BS or it's actually inferior to the Castle.

I wish the heavier duty Castle didn't use an air drill. I'm assuming it's hard to get a little electric motor up to a high enough RPM and have it last. I just hate using air as it's an expensive way to do things.

10/2/24       #11: Pockethole cutter ...
sam cohen Member

Karl -

Checked out your videos before, appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience.

How do you use your multiple machines?

Ultimately I'd like to go for a full size unit, but would rather not spend that much at the moment. I've been thinking if I get one of the big ones in the future, the benchtop one (the TSM-12 not the drill-it-yourself diy one) would be setup for one thing and the big one for something else. Plan is to use pocket holes for cabinet construction when it applies, face frame assembly once I get a clamp table, and non-dovetail drawer boxes. Maybe one would be setup for 3/4, one for thinner drawer material.

10/4/24       #12: Pockethole cutter ...
Matt Krig Member

Bigger air line on drill on top so it doesn't bind up, and a big cam that operates the whole movement and is adjustable to prevent binding and accommodate different materials. Small improvements that add up.

10/6/24       #13: Pockethole cutter ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

Sam, we have one in the face frame area that just does hardwood.

The other is near the assembly benches it has different tooling for doing miscellaneous materials. Plywood, mdf and some solid wood.

10/8/24       #14: Pockethole cutter ...
mike

Safety Speed Cut make a nice one..the company I work for has 2..

10/16/24       #15: Pockethole cutter ...
Mark

Does anyone have any experience with or opinions about the Maksiwa PHM30?

10/16/24       #16: Pockethole cutter ...
sam cohen Member

Was looking at that also. The comments on this video are the closest thing I could find to a review that wasn't an obvious advertisement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=060zPR2tQ7A

10/16/24       #17: Pockethole cutter ...
Leo G Member

Wow, what do you consider obvious advertisement if that wasn't it.

Looks like a nice machine.

10/16/24       #18: Pockethole cutter ...
sam cohen Member

Yeah the video's an obvious advertisement, and so are all the other "reviews" by Youtube woodworkers.

I meant the comments under the video.

10/16/24       #19: Pockethole cutter ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

Fron the YouTube comments, looks like a good idea and poor execution?

I always thought the action of the Castle Machine could use improvement. But they do have good support when I've reached out in the past

 

Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Limtech Industries, Inc. Lamello
    Today's Sponsors

    Become a Sponsor today!