Cabinetmaking

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

Double vs Triple Head Sander

2/5/18       
Ryan

We are a mostly face frame cabinet shop and we also build most of our own doors. We have always used single head sanders. Now we have a 53" Butfering. We are thinking about upgrading to a double head or triple head. I wanted to see what others thoughts were on a double head vs a triple head and if it is worth the extra money for the triple head.

2/5/18       #2: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Karl E Brogger  Member

Website: http://www.sogncabinets.com

If you can afford the up front costs of the triple head, have the space to place it, and the power to run it, go with the triple head.

I have a two head 43" Apex, and I really wish I could've gotten a three head when I got it. I maxed out what I could afford, it took up too much space in my old shop, and I had to trench in another service. A three head was completely out of the question.

My problem with the two head is I'm pushing it too hard. I'm taking almost .030" off each face using 120 grit on the first drum head, and 180 grit on the combo head. Taking 13/16" material down to .760" for doors and face frames.

My belts don't last very long.

I could make two passes and swap to courser belts for a first pass per face, but the belts are cheaper than paying somebody to feed and tail it.

I would likely triple my belt life or better if I had another head with 80 grit to start out with.

2/5/18       #3: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

The third head is free in the long run. It will pay for the machine in belt consumption in the life of the machine.

My favorite set up for a small cabinet shop is Drum, Drum, combination head. This is 4 contact points as long as you buy a machine that allows the use of both the drum and platen in the combi head at the same time.

Paper 80 AO, 120 AO, 180 AO is a great sequence.

Be sure to look for machines with dead shafts and air exclusion on all drums and platen.

120 - 180 can remove 0.014" in a pass without damaging your belts, your machine, and the color quality of your parts. An extra 15 minutes to run a first pass with 80 grit on the wide belt can save hours and hours on the hand sanding table with a proper set up.

Feel free to contact me for more information.

2/5/18       #4: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Gary

We went from a 2 head to a 3 head and it has been a good move. No belt changes now. Our belt sequence is 120 cloth, 180, and 220 paper on a combo head removing .020 per pass. We used to use 120,150,180. We have much less random orbit sanding with our current setup and belt life is better than the 2 head used to be. While we don't seem to need 80 grit, I agree with Adam that an extra pass is better than pushing the machine hard.

2/5/18       #5: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

Gary,

80, 120, 180 can last many times longer.

The max for 120, 150, 180 is .020".

If you use 80, 120, 180 it can remove up to .036". You are no longer maxing out the sequence taking your average pass, your hand sanding will be less, and your abrasive life will triple. Your color consistency will be much better. Assuming a drum, drum, combi.

There are articles explaining the reasoning on surfprepsanding.com

2/5/18       #6: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
duster

Adam - I'm thinking about making this move also. Which brands/models of machines have the specs you recommend?

2/5/18       #7: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

I cannot express a preference in my position with SurfPrep as a technician.

I can say that dead shaft drums are superior.

Air exclusion on each head is another very important feature.

Drum, drum, combi-head is a nearly perfect configuration. A certain company sells a combi-head that cannot be used as a drum platen at the same time. Only one or the other. Don't buy that. It's silly......

You can email me at Adam @ SurfPrep sanding. com. I left the spaces to avoid spammers.

2/5/18       #8: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
duster

What does "dead shaft drum" mean? I've never heard that term...

2/5/18       #9: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

In a live shaft drum the journals are welded into plates on both ends of the drum. The spin inside bearings on both ends.

A dead shaft is one that does not spin. The bearings are mounted on the shaft and the drum spins around the shaft that extends all the way through the drum.

2/5/18       #10: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
duster

Thanks for the clarification. I'll have look at my sander to see how it's set up...

2/6/18       #11: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Bill

While shopping don't forget the power needed to run a three head or the dust requirement. If you are short on dist collection "bad things" happen.

Good luck

Bill

2/6/18       #12: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Stuart

I 110% agree with Adam in that the third head is free.

Less belt changes, less handling & better quality make this one of the easiest justifications in the cabinet industry. Good luck!

2/6/18       #13: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
JR Rutter Member

I would like a 3rd head, but we are able to do a 120 / 180 with 3 contact points on our double head. Only remove 0.018 to 0.020" per pass, and do one pass per side.

2/6/18       #14: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

JR,

The max removal for 120 grit is 0.010" and 180 is 0.004".

When you max out your grit sequence it causes compression of the surface that will lead to color inconsistency and increased hand sanding, not to mention short abrasive life. It's not a good deal in the grand scheme.

If your heads have air exclusion the best set up is to use an 80 grit to flatten the surface using only the first drum. Then switch to 120, 180 for a finish pass. With proper set up it is not uncommon to sand 5,000 to 10,000 pcs on a set of belts.

If you don't have air exclusion then I'll do the set up with 80, 120 using only the drums, pull the platen. Then I would pop the platen back in and run just the last head with both drum and platen with 180.

This will have very similar results and abrasive life and great color consistency. The resulting scratch is beautiful and melts like butter under the random orbital with a 150 or 180 disk.

2/6/18       #15: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
JR Rutter Member

Ah, I was thinking 0.004" for the drum + 0.004" for the platen bar. Is it 0.004" total max for the two contact points?

2/6/18       #16: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Brent Member

Thank you again Adam for your response to my posts as well.

Yesterday was our first real day of a full shift on the 3 head sander - Steel Drum, Rubber Drum, Platen

80 grit, 120, 180

removing .012 .080 .040

running at 25 ft per minute (hard maple rips)

What a difference compared to our 2-head machine - which ended up mostly being used as a 1 head (since it was a drum, platen, which was a real waste of a second head).

I would go with a 3-head - you can pick up a good used one for $10Kish

2/6/18       #17: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

JR,

I would do .003" on the drum and .001" on the platen. Much better graphite longevity.

2/7/18       #18: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
the google

adam,

is there a lineal foot number you could approximate for belt life (assuming you're running your sander correctly)? we have a two head machine that we run 80g and 120g belts in. we're typically removing .010-.015" on the 80g and only use the 120g on the final pass (it is already set up lower than the 80g to remove those scratches).

we sand a lot of table tops and i'm curious about what we should expect from our belts. one thing that might be different is that we're grinding away a lot of glue as our two head is our primary/only way to level our glue ups. how much would sanding dried glue affect our belts?

right now, we're getting about a month out of our 80g belt. i'm not really sure how many lf this equals, but would guess we're getting 3000-4000 lf out of an 80g belt.

2/7/18       #19: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
JR Rutter Member

Thanks Adam.

2/7/18       #20: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Gary

Why is a dead shaft better? Does it run truer?

2/7/18       #21: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
Adam West  Member

Website: http://www.surfprepsanding.com

Much more ridged. Easier to set up for air exclusion.

2/8/18       #23: Double vs Triple Head Sander ...
JR Rutter

Adam, Could you email me? I think that mine may be getting stuck in your spam filter... jr at harmonic design works dot com

  • Post a Response to this thread
  • notify me of responses to this topic
  • To receive email notification of additions to this forum thread,
    enter your name and email address, and then click the
    "Keep Me Posted" button below.

    Please Note: If you have posted a message or response,
    do not submit this request ... you are already signed up
    to receive notification!

    Your Name:
    E-Mail Address:
    Enter the correct numbers into the field below:
     

    Date of your Birth:



    Return to top of page

    Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

    FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)