Computer Aided Design

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

2-D autocad user but want 3-D

5/15/24       
Mike

I have been using AutoCAD 2-D for years and it has worked for me, but I would like to be able to provide my customers 3-D cad drawings in black-and-white. I’m not interested in learning color renderings or anything of the sort.

I have been paying for a subscription through a company for AutoCAD, as many of you have been since they no longer sell the program. I am not very happy with the service being provided with the company I am currently with and as of December of this year, I will need to find a different company to have my subscription through. I asked them what program they would recommend to draw cabinetry, piece by piece in 3-D without having to relearn AutoCAD 3-D. I know there has to be a more user-friendly program than AutoCAD 3-D. Or am I living a dream here? For some reason, they can’t seem to offer suggestions of which autodesk program would be easier to learn than AutoCAD 3-D. I’m not looking for a program to do cut lists for me either, as I have a separate entity for that and it works well for me for the amount of times I need to use it.

Does anyone have any suggestions/recommendations of a 3-D CAD program by autodesk or someone else for that matter that will be easier to learn than 3-D AutoCAD? I’ve considered learning sketch up, but I don’t know what exactly is entailed and learning that either. Thoughts? Ty

5/15/24       #2: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Mike

I also do not know how to write code and I’m not interested in learning how.

5/15/24       #3: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad Member

Bricscad

5/15/24       #4: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Mike

David, can you tell me more about it? Is it intertwined with AutoCAD in any regard? How difficult is it to learn? Do you happen to know if there’s a free trial? Do you have a website?

5/15/24       #5: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Michael Member

Budget?

There are dozens of AutoCAD-like programs, from free to $100US to $1k US.
(Bricscad, AllyCAD, NanoCAD) that have that ACAD feel, and go 2D-to-3D.
There are dozens more 3D focused mechanical CAD offerings with perpetual licenses, still, from $1k to $5k US, that have excellent 2D drafting. (VariCAD at the lower end, IronCAD at the higher end)

Sketchup was great for a time, but I can't conscionably support Trimble, for what they did to my (not cheap) perpetual license. I replaced my Sketchup, with IronCAD.

If you are doing free modelling every day, IronCAD feels very productive for making ideas into reality, and the convenience is worth the price. Otherwise, VariCAD is cheap and full-featured

https://www.varicad.com/en/home/online-store/

5/16/24       #6: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad Member

Mike,
They have a 30 day demo and perpetual licensing if that's what you want. It's the closest thing to Acad I can I've ever seen except, it's better and in many respects.
I know you don't do code, but I do and the source code I have complies for BricsCAD and Acad at the same time. So, it will probably be the shortest learning curve for those that already know Acad.

The 3d solid modeling tools allows the stretching of multiple 3d solids to a plane. That's something Acad does not have. It also has parametrics and bim and can unfold shapes flat too. It's basically Acad and Solidworks and Revit all at the same time, depending on what interface you might choose to use.
5/16/24       #7: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Mike

Ty michael and david.

Will any of these that you are proposing allow me the option to draw in 2-D and three separately? This way, I can avoid AutoCAD altogether and do 2-D for simpler jobs and then 3-D for obviously more complex jobs.… Or am I going to be stuck still using AutoCAD for my 2-D drawings and 3-D for things more decorative?

Here is one job I would have loved to have drawn in 3-D. I would need to draw all four parts of a column, plus the fluted part of it as well and then make it into one assembly and then have the capability to stretch and shrink the entire assembly without losing Say the flutes are 2 inches from the top and 2 inches from the bottom are either of the programs you guys are suggesting have tutorials in YouTube that I can start to learn from before I activate the 30 day trial?

Also, the programs you are suggesting, are they strictly black and white or do they have the option to do color and how realistic can you make it? I’m not really interested in learning the rendering part of things, as I’m a one person company and I have enough crap going on that I really don’t have Hundreds of hours to dedicate to learning another program to that degree but just curious to know what the program can do unless you guys know of a video that will show me what any of them will end up having the capability to do. Thanks again guys


View higher quality, full size image (2304 X 1536)

5/16/24       #8: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Mike

David, you are right regarding this is very close to AutoCAD. What is the best way to go about learning the actual program itself? Is there any type of support for people that would speak English, because it appears to be a European based software program. Here is a video I found that looks very close to what I’m looking to do.

Does this have the same capabilities as plotting that AutoCAD does, as I Have a big plotter

https://youtu.be/jQGK0ypYyaw?si=kw5WvQxp6a0XCcSn

What does using code benefit you?

Obviously I have 1 million questions that can’t all be answered in this forum. I remember the slice and subtract command, but I forgot how to use them. Is there a video that will go over the different commands and show you how to use them?

5/16/24       #9: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad Member

Hi Mike, per our phone discussion, grab a copy and we can do a walk through and you can see what it will take. It works almost exactly like Acad and will plot and use viewport and flatshot in addition to having parametrics for standard cabinets.

5/20/24       #10: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Brent Wilkerson Member

In regards to writing code ... are you referring to code in AutoCAD (like AutoLISP, ARX or VBA) or G-Code for machine(s) or overall general "code" like VBA, C++, Python, etc.?

I can provide tips and resourses for AutoLISP inside AutoCAD ... but you would need to give specifics of an example of what you'd like to do with a LISP routine.
And my honest opinion ... if you've been doing AutoCAD 2D AutoCAD can and does 3D .. ok. It's not parametric like Inventor or SolidWorks though.

5/20/24       #11: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Brent Wilkerson Member

Here is an example of 3D cabinets in AutoCAD via Microvellum


View higher quality, full size image (708 X 537)

5/21/24       #12: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad Member

Hi Brent,
Mike isn't coding anything.
I have all kinds of code in different languages for different tasks. My preferred language is C# these days. I get help from others as frequently needed, mostly friends.
Mike doesn't remember the 3d basics in Acad and we are going to do a walk through on BricsCAD doing a screen share and maybe learn a few things together. They gave me a developer licence for BricsCAD and my first piece of code is a brep traverser. I still have not finished it because I don't have the time. I need to focus with some time or it becomes too complicated and frustrating for me. Without all of the checks for errors in there for currently unsupported geometry, it runs fine in any version of AutoCAD 2008 up and BricsCAD too. Same code. It compliles to 4 different versions. A release and a debug version for both. Me doing that.... that's a testament to the support I have and are given by others. Matrices and transformations and translations, xdata, xrecord, opengl projections, sqlite, and much more is next, and then most of it will be thrown away if something new that I know about becomes available because that uses all of the understanding above with the practical understanding of the construction business and the priority issues and the learning vs output and the accessibility to all users.
I currently have a c# program that finds the MV window and then is used to communicate with and drive Microvellum via the commandline and scripts that are large and instantly dynamically created on the fly that MV runs, as well editing the cad data I want to edit as a dxf in netDXF. The code tells oem MV what to export via the commandline and wblock, the editing is done in netDXF, and then tells oem MV or Acadlite to import the dxf.
The funny thing here is that it seems to me that Acad actually does the operations faster than arx or VB. It's scary fast for the simple things I have used it for.
My brep traverser needs a rewrite. I was still learning and have so many comments and notes that need for output to a csv for development purposes and that unneeded code in my code there is tripping me up now.
For the fastest CNC feature recognition for 3D solids I need to get the face normals, and that can only be done after traversing the entire loop of a face to get the clockwise or counterclockwise order of vertice points. e.g. I have to have the correct normal for each entity of it's corresponding face, but I am already past that in my loop and would have to go back and edit the data as it's currently written. I'll get it figured out sometime, if I ever have time. It's not a problem that cannot be solved at all. It's key to avoid the transactions to save time. I want this particular feature recognition module to be magnitudes of time faster than what I was doing previously. I can create the files basically instantly If I don't need to manipulate the CAD environment in the process.
5/21/24       #13: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Brent Wilkerson Member

Wow .... that's alot and good luck with that :-)

No help with C# or C++ - Mainly know LISP and VB - And haven't had the need for learning anything more ... LOL

But what you described sounds very interesting though!

5/22/24       #14: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad

It's nice if you have acadlite or verision of acad that does not have support for 3rd party apps. I can fill out title blocks automatically from the data already have, measure entities much easier than with acad's data collection, clean up 2d drawings of 400,000 lines or more in just seconds and create and generate the documents that I will need for that specific project and ot goes on and on. Sometimes we don't know what is possible, but if it saves time and makes it easier than a business probably needs it or at least can benefit from it. Yeah, it's a lot.

5/22/24       #15: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Dan

Mike,

If you already know AutoCad and are adept at drawing in 2d, the transition to 3d AutoCad should probably be easier than learning a new software.

Once you draw something in 3d AutoCad you have the ability get sections and all information needed for your 2d drawing in Paper Space.

With some add-on programs you can also get a bill of material and use the 3d parts to make the part drawings needed for a CNC. If a cabinet is drawn in 3d AutoCad, there is rarely a need for any 2d drawings. All elevations, sections and details for the drawings in Paper Space are derived from the 3d model.

If I have a cabinet drawing in 3d AutoCad, there is rarely a need for any 2d drawing All elevations, sections and details are derived from the 3d model.

Personally I have tried other software that draw in 3d environment and find AutoCad was an easier transition, than learning a product like SkethUp or Inventor.

5/24/24       #16: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad Member

Dan, a few people have mentioned to me that Acad 3d is not as fun as SketchUp.
One of the best signatures I have ever read in a forum post was something like...
"May your osnaps always snap to where you intended".
What a nice thought..... :P
5/24/24       #17: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Dan Jensen

Hey David,

I hope all is well.

AutoCad may not be as fun as Sketchup. Though, AutoCad can be quite productive even in 3d. It may also be the easiest transition to 3d if a user is proficient in 2d. If a user wants more color and fun in AutoCad you can always try rendering.

Lastly if a user wants to have more fun, try Fusion by AutoDesk. To add even more fun, if you are drawing cabinets add the app JoinerCad.

In the end, what is the user looking for. Fun and a pretty picture and Sketchup may be the best for them. If the user wants to learn a marketable skill and produce drawings that provide more than simply lines, well then AutoCad is a good program.

6/23/24       #19: NotifyOnlyPost ...
pat gilbert

If you are wearing many hats I don't think I would to add a time consuming task to the hat rack

I started using 3d with Solidworks , then Autocad 3d, then sketchup with cabinet sense

7/4/24       #20: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
Kirk Member

Website: https://virmer.com/

That’s a tough spot with the Cabnetware dongle issue, especially with Planit no longer supporting it. You might have luck finding independent experts who can help bypass the dongle or offer a workaround. I'd also recommend checking out forums or user groups for legacy software, as they can be a great resource for finding someone who has dealt with similar issues.

8/8/24       #21: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
SW

Mozaik is the way to go. You can get a 3rd party add on to do renderings if you want

8/9/24       #22: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad

GStarCAD, is another viable option atm.

8/10/24       #23: 2-D autocad user but want 3-D ...
David Wishengrad

GStarCAD s viable now, but maybe not in the future. Doing business with a company based out of China may be extremely problematic in the future for those depending on it in a business based environment. I didn't know. I had requested a developer licence because my current code base that runs in both BricsCAD and AutoCAD could also easily include GStar. They all use the same basic ACIS based API. However, when my email request was not answered I then looked around and saw that they are out of China and not being legally allowed to contact anyone there could be right around the corner or even access the Chinese market. So, think it over. It might not be worth the little saved now. For an ACIS based modeler that works just like ACAD with a perpetual license it is dirt cheap. I personally wouldn't want any software out of China on a development machine or a business machine on a network.


Post a Response
  • Notify me of responses to this thread
  • Subscribe to email updates on this Forum
  • To receive email notification of additions to this forum thread,
    enter your name and email address, and then click the
    "Keep Me Posted" button below.

    Please Note: If you have posted a message or response,
    do not submit this request ... you are already signed up
    to receive notification!

    Your Name:
    E-Mail Address:
    Enter the correct numbers into the field below:
     

    Date of your Birth:



    Return to top of page

    Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

    FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Sponsors
    • TradeSoft
      Seamless Management Software to Improve Estimating, Job Costing, Scheduling, Purchasing, Shipping, and Shop Floor Data Collection
    • CabMaster Software
      The Easiest Custom Cabinetry Software
    • The Millwork Studio
      Millwork Shop Drawings and Estimates
    • NEMI
      Products For CNC Machines - Digitizers, Tool Setters, Vacuum Pods, Vacuum Cups, Vacuum Tables, Vacuum Chucks and Software
    • Cabinetshop Maestro
      Web-Based Project Management Software for Custom Cabinet Shops - Manage Jobs from Prospect to Punchlist Through Scheduling, Task Management, Time Tracking and Communication
    • Thermwood Corporation
      Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Routers and Accessories
    • Rangate
      Woodworking Machinery, Supplies and Knowledge
    • ECabinet Systems
      Free, Fully Functional Cabinet Design Software and Kitchen Layout Software
    • KCD Software
      Powerful 3D Cabinet/Closet Design Software with Built-In Touchscreen Mode for Mobile Use with Best Production Practices Including Direct to Cut List, Cabinotch and/or CNC Machining

    Become a Sponsor today!