Total Finishing Supplies

Professional Finishing

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

conversion varnish looks slightly milky when applied in cooler weather.

11/18/24       
stoneaxe Member

Our finishing is done by a independent finish shop. It is conversion varnish. The shop has a large rollup door, often partially open. I would call the climate in the shop "semi" controlled. This is in the Pacific Northwest- high outside humidity in the winter. In the fall, I have started to notice a slightly milky look to the finish, and occasional hazy white spots here and there. Is this a temperature-humidity problem? Is there anything else that could cause it?

11/18/24       #2: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
FM

It’s blush. Too much humidity trapped under the finish.

12/3/24       #3: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
Professor Finishing

There are several variables that can cause this effect.
A) check the bottom of the pail make sure no settlement of flatten paste.
B) no air movement flowing over finish as it can trap active solvent from off gasing.
C) atomized air at the gun 16-24 psi
Too much air will cause premature skimming.

Hope this helps

12/3/24       #4: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe Member

Thanks for the replies.
The manufacturer info says spray temp. minimum is 68 degrees F.
Not sure about what pressure the applicator is using.
It is not flattening agent as far as I can tell.

12/21/24       #5: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
Jim Clark Member

Are you using lacquer thinner for thinning?
If so, I bet that is it.
Most lacquer thinners today are reconstituted junk containing
a lot of water.
I now use automotive urethane reducer to thin my CV.
Gives much better results.
12/21/24       #6: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe Member

Not sure if the finisher is using a reducer- I will check. There is a bit of a break in our production so no recent results to look at.
I will set them up with some samples to see if the problem can be isolated- it has the potential to be devastatingly expensive, as there does not seem to be any corrective action that can be taken , except re-milling the entire job. .

On a side note, throughout my career, maintaining quality from sub's has been the single biggest stress.

2/24/25       #7: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe Member

More trouble.
I printed off this thread , gave it to the finisher to read. Bought a hydrometer and thermometer for his shop. Had him keep it to 70 f and shoot some samples. They were acceptable.
Then brought up a couple of jobs to do and they have blush-milky looking finish. The maple is sort of acceptable- the cherry looks kind of light, and the sapele looks sort of dull with a pink cast.
He had to suspend work because it was hard to keep the shop warm enough, we had a cold spell.
He is using the recommended reducer.
Is there a reducer made for colder weather use?
A finish that has a dull rubbed effect that is durable and usable in colder weather?
I am so tired of this.

2/24/25       #8: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
Tyler

I don't think I've ever had an issue with 2k poly or acrylic blushing. It's also just a better finish than CV in just about every way other than cost, but in my experience the cost isn't really that much more. The finishing process is almost identical minus some extended drying times on the primer, but it's not usually anything crazy.

I also believe water borne don't really blush. Some of the catalyzed waterbased polys are really, really durable finishes. probably exceeding that of CV.

2/24/25       #9: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe

I don't care about product cost. Just a good finish. We don't use a lot of it, it goes on high value product. I just want something forgiving my finishers can use without problems.

2/24/25       #10: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
FM

Can you post a pic? While I think it’s blush I have to admit to having shot a lot of CVs in colder than needed conditions when I was young and poor. Never an issue. What brand of finish? have you checked he’s using the right catalyst and right amount of it? How thick is he laying it on? Shooting CV is not terribly difficult and it’s pretty forgiving. Something is off. Where are you located? You would have to have some crazy humidity I think to keep causing these problems

2/25/25       #11: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe Member

Here are a few pics. The problem wood finish is the piece in the middle, control samples to each side. Note the grey-pink haze, all the grain definition and wet look is gone. The maple lost all amber overtone, the finish made it bone white.
Looks like someone mixed dog crap with mud and shot it on. Can you tell I am upset about this?


View higher quality, full size image (576 X 432)


View higher quality, full size image (576 X 432)


View higher quality, full size image (576 X 432)

2/25/25       #12: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
Tyler

Doesnt look like blush to me. Whenever i've had blush its pretty inconsistent, blotchy looking.

What product are you using? I remember there was a precat I used once, when the finish went on too thick the flattening agent would settle and look something like that.

Finished could be over catalyzing, I've seen similar results when thats happened before.

2/25/25       #13: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
FM

All blushing I have ever seen/had has been when spraying precat lacquer and it comes and goes. It’s not uniform like this across the entire piece. It has an uneven appearance to it. Are you sure he is spraying the same product as the samples. It looks like bad water white finish or more aptly old school water born with the bluish hue. Waterwhite is preferred in many situations. Walnut and to a lesser extent maple are not instances where this is the case.

2/25/25       #14: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
FM

That said, as long as the finish has integrity (have you tested it for how easily it scratches and done an adhesion test?). These could be solved with a further toner coat or two if the finish has integrity. At least with what is in the photos. No reason to strip if the finish is not flaking off, doesn’t scratch easily, will not pull off with blue tape after doing a grid with a razor blade in the finish.

2/25/25       #15: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
Professor finishing

Check the edges to see if they have white haze or are they good/clear. Just hold the edge to a flat surface do they look different? If so that could be an indication of applying too many wet mils.

2/26/25       #16: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe

The photo is not the best, putting a toner over the existing finish would change the color, but the problem is it is already so dull- the wood is obscured, like a a dirty windshield.
Might as well use paint.

The piece shown to the left of the center problem child , is the control sample the finish shop coated a week before, because they messed up the PREVIOUS job. Not so badly, and on a lighter wood, so it was sort of acceptable, but because I could see it, I asked them to make sure it was not going to happen again.

I need a new career. Unfortunately we have some big orders already on the books. Gotta get them done somehow- this is so bad I am actually considering a hand rubbed oil finish on them.....

2/26/25       #17: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
FM

Pictures lie, but I think you're over reacting to the fix. It just lacks the color. Toner fixes this.

Was thinking last night, the other time I have seen this is when someone uses too much sealer and not enough topcoat. Sealers will give it the milky/cloudly look if more than one coat is used often. Some finishers attempt to save money if 3 coats are required by using 2 sealers and 1 topcoat instead of 1 sealer coat and 2 topcoats. I think this might be your issue if he is using conversion varnish.
Good luck

2/26/25       #18: conversion varnish looks slightly m ...
stoneaxe


They are using the CV as a sealer.
I took two more photos, against two different pieces of sapele.
It looks like they finished the wood with milk. It looks dead. All the reflectivity is gone. Like they turned it into plastic laminate.


View higher quality, full size image (576 X 432)


View higher quality, full size image (576 X 432)


Post a Response
  • Notify me of responses to this thread
  • Subscribe to email updates on this Forum
  • To receive email notification of additions to this forum thread,
    enter your name and email address, and then click the
    "Keep Me Posted" button below.

    Please Note: If you have posted a message or response,
    do not submit this request ... you are already signed up
    to receive notification!

    Your Name:
    E-Mail Address:
    Enter the correct numbers into the field below:
     

    Date of your Birth:



    Return to top of page

    Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

    FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Sponsors
    • Carter Products
      Band Saw Guides, Blades, Wheels, Tires, Line Lasers and 2D Projectors, Wide Belt Sanding Accessories, Vacuum Holding Systems and More
    • Simantech
      New & Used Machinery, Supplies, Tooling, Parts, and Abrasive Products
    • TotalFinishingSUPPLIES.com
      Solutions and supplies from spray tips to spray booths for all your woodworking needs
    • EX-FACTORY INC.
      Offering New & Used Woodworking Machinery including Auctions & Liquidations
    • Unique Machine & Tool
      Industrial Machinery for Door and Drawer Production

    Become a Sponsor today!